{"id":9438,"date":"2025-12-08T16:45:01","date_gmt":"2025-12-08T15:45:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.rldatix.com\/en-uki\/?p=9438"},"modified":"2026-04-07T14:42:23","modified_gmt":"2026-04-07T13:42:23","slug":"clinical-nursing-workforce-profile-and-utilisation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.rldatix.com\/en-uki\/resources\/clinical-nursing-workforce-profile-and-utilisation\/","title":{"rendered":"Clinical Nursing Workforce Profile and Utilisation:"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

The impact of a shift towards a more inexperienced nursing workforce in the UK (Post-COVID)<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Since the COVID-19 pandemic, the UK nursing workforce has undergone significant structural changes, particularly in the distribution of the NHS band grades. The impact of such changes has seen a greater proportion of less experienced staff at the front end of direct patient care, where they are making some of the most safety critical decisions. This is exacerbated by stretched senior staff presence resulting in less opportunity for mentorship, skills development and clinical supervision structures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Coupled with this, the utilisation of our existing workforce demonstrates a widening gap between planned headroom and the actual availability of our workforce for deployment. As such, reactive management of these variable and unplanned gaps can result in inappropriate skill mixes and further impact on the clinical confidence of our less experienced workforce.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

So Who Do We Have and How Are We Utilising Our Workforce?<\/strong><\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n

In considering this question, data from both the main workforce planning e-rostering solution and clinical deployment solution across the NHS in the UK have been observed. Key data for unavailability, activity, geographic changes, along with red flag and professional judgement application over time and by staff band, has been considered.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Headline Numbers<\/strong><\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n

The headline numbers suggest we have more qualified nurses in 2025 than ever before with 853,707 on the NMC Register (NMC, 2025)<\/strong> with circa 50,000 additional vacant posts<\/strong>. However, what is perhaps most concerning and reflective of the perceptions of this less experienced workforce, is that only a third of nursing staff feel they have enough registered nurses on shifts<\/strong> (Royal College of Nursing 2024).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

If only it were just a numbers game. The changing profile of our workforce post-COVID, the increasing care and capacity requirements, along with the actual availability of our clinical workforce, creates a perfect storm to throw the numbers into disarray.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The Unseen Pressures Behind the Numbers<\/strong><\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Additionally, much remains unseen and therefore not necessarily captured in these required numbers. Excess capacity and corridor care, increasing patient acuity and complexity, a lack of experienced senior mentorship, and greater reliance on non-EU recruits requiring adaptation periods of supervision all contribute to further pressure on the entire workforce. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

For some areas, we are only starting to quantify some of the additional unseen requirements, such as across community care, through increased ability to match clinical capacity with patient requirements and accurately record deferred care, the community equivalent of corridor care. The numbers here suggest vast increases will be required<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n\n

The Workforce Utilisation Gap<\/strong><\/strong><\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n

Across all sectors, there is another significant challenge to the numbers: the existing workforce is currently operating with a consistently growing gap of unavailability.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Not from vacancies, but from the unaccounted absence of those considered present within the established workforce. If we generally accept headroom for nursing as being set around 22%<\/strong>, this is a far cry from the reality, which is that the average provider is now operating at 26\u201332% unavailability<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This further gap is largely being managed by additional duties on top of the temporary staffing requirements covering vacancy gaps. As a result, the resilience of this less experienced workforce is buckling, as evidenced by the dominant driver of this overall unavailability: sickness between 5\u201310% due to stress, anxiety and depression.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

With 3% being accounted for in headroom, there is up to 7% additional unavailability for sickness alone<\/strong>, with an overall variance of up to 13% across all unavailability<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This changing profile of our workforce post-COVID, the increasing care and capacity requirements, along with the actual availability of our clinical workforce, creates a perfect storm to throw any numbers into disarray.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

What Impact does all this have on Safe Staffing and Patient Safety<\/strong><\/strong><\/strong><\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
<\/div>\n\n\n\n

While recruitment has increased, experienced staff losses and reliance on lower-band roles have raised concerns for care quality, staff wellbeing and system resilience.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As an indicator, Red Flags and Professional Judgements are being applied by clinical staff with lower experience and skill level today compared to pre-COVID.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n